In re D. Wilson Constr. Co – Case Brief Summary (Texas)

In In re D. Wilson Constr. Co., 196 S.W.3d 774 (Tex. 2006) the relators-defendants moved to compel arbitration under both the TAA and the FAA, which requests the trial court denied. 196 S.W.3d at 778.

The contracts involved interstate commerce, thus triggering the FAA, and referenced neither the TAA nor the FAA. Id. at 778-79.

The supreme court held that "the mere fact that a contract affects interstate commerce, thus triggering the FAA, does not preclude enforcement under the TAA as well," as long as the FAA does not preempt the TAA. Id. at 780.

Because the FAA did not preempt the TAA in that case, the supreme court held that the court of appeals had jurisdiction over both an interlocutory appeal taken under the TAA's provisions and a mandamus proceeding. Id.

The supreme court then proceeded to consider the matter in the original proceeding, dismissing the related interlocutory appeal as moot after having granted full relief in the former proceeding. Id. at 783-84.

Texas Appeal Arbitration Case Brief Compelling Arbitration (Motions/Petitions/Actions)Contracts Dismiss Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)Interlocutory Appeal Jurisdiction Mandamus Mootness Doctrine Provision

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.