Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type
Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

In re J.G.Z – Case Brief Summary (Texas)

In In re J.G.Z., 963 S.W.2d 144 (Tex. App. -- Texarkana 1998, no pet.) the trial court awarded a "judgment" for retroactive support of $ 55,000.00, which it characterized as an arrearage. In re J.G.Z., 963 S.W.2d at 147.

The Court first found that the trial court erred in characterizing the award as an arrearage, because the appellee did not specifically request a money judgment, and because the requested child support was to be set and then made retroactive, so there was no arrearage on which a cumulative judgment could be set under TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 157.263 (Vernon 1996). In re J.G.Z., 963 S.W.2d at 148.

The Court then held that the trial court's judgment was really a child support order, and that a judgment for arrearage could only be awarded if the appellant failed to make payments as required.