King Bearings v. King – Case Brief Summary (Federal Court)

In King Bearings v. King, 882 F. Supp. 630 (W.D. Ky. 1994), the District Court ordered the use of a disclaimer, having found that there was a likelihood of confusion in the metropolitan Louisville/southern Indiana area.

The court noted that disclaimers had been held to be an adequate remedy when sufficient to "avoid substantially" the risk of consumer confusion. Id. at 636.

U.S. Federal Courts Case Brief Court Order Disclaimer Likelihood of Confusion

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.