Bank of the United States v. Bank of Washington (1832)
In Bank of the United States v. Bank of Washington (1832) 31 U.S. 8, the Supreme court, after observing that the party against whom an erroneous judgment has been enforced does not lose his remedy against the party to the judgment, said:
"On the reversal of the judgment the law raises an obligation in the party to the record, who has received the benefit of the erroneous judgment, to make restitution to the other party for what he has lost; and the mode of proceeding to effect this object must be regulated according to circumstances. Sometimes it is done by a writ of restitution, without a scire facias, when the record shows the money has been paid, and there is a certainty as to what has been lost. In other cases a scire facias may be necessary to ascertain what is to be restored. 2 Salk. 587-8; Tidd's Pract. 936, 1137-8. And, no doubt, circumstances may exist where an action may be sustained to recover back the money."