Brock v. North Carolina
In Brock v. North Carolina, 344 U.S. 424 (1953), the Court upheld a state conviction against a somewhat similar claim of denial of due process.
In Brock two of the State's key witnesses had previously been tried and convicted of crimes arising out of the same transaction which formed the basis of the charge against the petitioner.
Before judgments were entered on their convictions they were called by the State to testify at petitioner's trial.
Because of their intention to appeal their convictions and the likelihood of a new trial in the event of reversal, the two witnesses declined to testify at petitioner's trial on the ground that their answers might be self-incriminatory.
At this point the State was granted a mistrial upon its representation that the evidence of the two witnesses was necessary to its case and that it intended to procure their testimony at a new trial of the petitioner.
The Court held that a second trial of the petitioner did not violate due process.