In State v. Velasquez, 672 P.2d 1254 (Utah 1983), the Court concluded that the reasonableness of an adult parolee's expectation of privacy could not be determined without considering "both . . . the government function involved" and "the private interest . . . affected." Id. at 1259 The Court then "balanced the interests of both the state and the individual" and held that it was "not unreasonable for a conditionally released convict to be accorded a more narrowly protected privacy interest in order to facilitate" the operation of the adult parole system. Id. at 1259-60.