Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type
Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

Appropriate Technology Corp. v. Palma – Case Brief Summary (Vermont)

In Appropriate Technology Corp. v. Palma, 146 Vt. 643, 508 A.2d 724 (1986), the defendant worked for the plaintiff for a promise of payment in stock and a very low salary because the corporation was undercapitalized, and quit under family financial pressures.

Unknown to the defendant, the plaintiff's president received a substantial capital contribution to the corporation and intentionally failed to disclose it to defendant.

The defendant brought a counterclaim for the value of the promised stock, and was awarded punitive damages.

The Court affirmed because the "president knowingly misrepresented plaintiff's finances, and that . . . misrepresentation induced defendant to leave the corporation's employ." Id. at 648, 508 A.2d at 727.