State v. Poirier
In State v. Poirier, 34 Wn. App. 839, 664 P.2d 7 (1983), the defendant argued that when he was arrested and released on posting bail, he was being "held to answer," and the speedy trial clock began running at that time. Poirier, 34 Wn. App. at 840.
Division Two's rejection of that argument turned on the fact that the State had filed a "No Charges Filed" document pursuant to former CrR3.2A(c)(2) (now CrR3.2B(c)(2)). Id.