In State v. James, 176 Wis. 2d 230, 238, 500 N.W.2d 345 (Ct. App. 1993), the Court concluded that a defendant need not be notified of the collateral consequences of probation revocation because the possibility of revocation is controlled by the defendant's own actions and by the discretionary acts of an administrative agency. See James, 176 Wis. 2d at 244 n.6.