In Barnette v. Hartford Ins. Group, 653 P.2d 1375 (Wyo. 1982), the insurance policy contained a severability of interest clause that identified Barnette as an insured, and a cross-employee exclusion clause that excluded Barnette from the category of insureds. Id. After examining the reasons for each of the conflicting clauses, the Court resolved the inconsistent language of the Barnette policy in favor of coverage. Id. at 1383.