Burk v. State
In Burk v. State, 848 P.2d 225, 236 (Wyo. 1993), the Court found sufficient proof that the district court had considered probation when it imposed sentences in two cases against the defendant. 848 P.2d at 236.
In the first case, the defense counsel argued for leniency and mentioned that other persons involved in the defendant's case had received probation. Id.
In the second case, the defense counsel asked for leniency, the defendant's parents requested that the court grant probation, and the presentence investigation report addressed the issue of probation. Id.