In Holland v. Holland, 2001 WY 113, 35 P.3d 409, P8 (Wyo. 2001), the husband complained about the district court's division of marital property and argued the court should have explained a portion of the award to the wife which appeared to be intended to balance the disparity created by the award of an investment account to the husband. The Court responded: "Husband contends that this Court must be able to ascertain with certainty what the basis for that $ 135,000.00 payment is. The contrary is true. Husband had the burden of demonstrating that the evidence adduced before the district court did not support the property distribution as a whole. This he has failed to do."